Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Supreme Court clarifies the scope and ambit of Interim Moratorium in Personal Insolvency Proceedings
    2025-03-18

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Khaitan & Co, State Bank of India, Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Financial services banks, Financial services corporate
    Authors:
    Kumar Saurabh Singh , Rahul Chakraborti , Ashwij Ramaiah
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    Interim moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 will impact the pending proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 despite secured lender having possession of the asset
    2024-07-25

    On July 2, 2024, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”), in the case of Sanjay Dhingra vs.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Delhi High Court, National Company Law Tribunal, Financial services banks, Financial services corporate
    Authors:
    Varghese Thomas , Ahsan Allana , Shaan Bhatt
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    SCOTUS term in review
    2024-07-25

    Weil's Appellate & Strategic Counseling group welcomes you to Weil's SCOTUS Term Review. Here, we summarize and analyze the cases from the 2023 Supreme Court Term that are most germane to our clients' businesses.

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, US Securities and Exchange Commission, US Food and Drug Administration, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), False Claims Act 1863 (USA), Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 (USA), Administrative Procedure Act, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Financial services banks, Financial services corporate, Hardware, devices & electronic equipment, Media, Software & SAAS, Technology
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Corporate Insights: Ten Reasons to Expect an Increase in Financial Restructurings in 2025
    2024-07-01

    1. Commercial Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filings Have Increased Significantly Year-Over-Year: There has been a significant increase in the number of commercial Chapter 11 cases (larger company filings) in 2024. By way of example, there were 1,894 commercial Chapter 11 filings (including subchapter V filings) during the first quarter of 2024, up 43% from the 1,325 total commercial chapter 11 filings during the first calendar quarter of 2023 according to data provided by Epiq Bankruptcy, the leading provider of U.S. bankruptcy filing data.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bowditch & Dewey LLP, Financial services banks
    Authors:
    Mark W. Powers , Aastha Sharma
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bowditch & Dewey LLP
    Corporate insolvency resolution process can be initiated separately and simultaneously against a corporate debtor and a corporate guarantor for the same debt and same default
    2024-08-05

    In the case of BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. vs. SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. & Anr. the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) held that simultaneous insolvency proceedings against a borrower and a corporate guarantor can be initiated for the same debt and default; and that assets of a subsidiary do not form part of the corporate insolvency resolution process (“CIRP”) of its holding company.

    Brief Facts

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Bank of India, State Bank of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, Financial services banks, Financial services corporate
    Authors:
    Divyanshu Pandey , Shrijita Bhattacharya , Aaditya Shukla
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days